Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW		NS	EW
1 O'CONNOR Team	37 HENTON Team	2 S		11	150			8	-8
2 HARRIS Team	10 LIVINGSTON Team	3 S	2C	11	150			6	-6
3 PHILLIPS Team	7 MATSKOWS Team	3 W	3C	8	50			-14	14
4 CAMP Team	39 DAVIES Team	5 N	5S	10		100		3	-3
5 HAJMASI Team	26 RICHARDSON Team	2 E	2D	9		140		-7	7
6 JANISZ Team	20 FRASER-HOSKIN Team	4 N	4S	11	150			-10	10
7 MATSKOWS Team	3 PHILLIPS Team	5X E	AS	6	1100			14	-14
8 GLASS Team	33 CURRY Team	3NT S	9C	9	600			13	-13
9 WATT Team	38 WALTERS Team	3 N	AH	9	110			0	0
10 LIVINGSTON Team	2 HARRIS Team	5 N	6S	10		100		-6	6
11 SIMPSON Team	23 GAO BI Team	5 S	QH	11	600			10	-10
12 MORRIS Team	27 FISHER Team	4 E	AC	6	200			-9	9
13 TANGNEY Team	25 TARBUTT Team	5 N	AH	10		100		0	0
14 EDGINTON Team	40 WOODHALL Team	5 S	KS	12	620			11	-11
15 CARTNER Team	34 YAN Team	3 S	QH	8		100		-5	5
16 BARTOSH Team	31 WARE Team	3 E	AC	8	50			-11	11
17 YOUNG Team	22 MIAO Team	5 N	4S	10		100		-5	5
18 WINSOR Team	30 LEWIS Team	5 S	3S	11	600			0	0
19 WHIBLEY Team	29 GRANT Team	2 S		11	150			1	-1
20 FRASER-HOSKIN Team	6 JANISZ Team	5 S	3S	11	600			10	-10
21 WESTOBY Team	24 NISBET Team	4 N	5S	10	130			0	0
22 MIAO Team	17 YOUNG Team	2 S	2C	9	110			5	-5
23 GAO BI Team	11 SIMPSON Team	4 S	2C	10	130			-10	10
24 NISBET Team	21 WESTOBY Team	4 S	2H	10	130			0	0
25 TARBUTT Team	13 TANGNEY Team	5 N	AH	10		100		0	0
26 RICHARDSON Team	5 HAJMASI Team	2 S	3H	10	130			7	-7
27 FISHER Team	12 MORRIS Team	5 S	4S	11	600			9	-9
28 DRISCOLL Team	36 CAMERON Team	2 S	6H	10	130			1	-1
29 GRANT Team	19 WHIBLEY Team	4 N	5S	10	130			-1	1
30 LEWIS Team	18 WINSOR Team	5 S	3S	11	600			0	0
31 WARE Team	16 BARTOSH Team	3NT S	2S	9	600			11	-11
32 BEER Team	35 YANAGISAWA Team	2 S	3S	12	170			2	-2
33 CURRY Team	8 GLASS Team	5X S	7S	10		200		-13	13
34 YAN Team	15 CARTNER Team	2 S	2C	9	110			5	-5
35 YANAGISAWA Team	32 BEER Team	2 S		9	110			-2	2
36 CAMERON Team	28 DRISCOLL Team	3 S	2C	9	110			-1	1
37 HENTON Team	1 O'CONNOR Team	5 N	AH	9		200		-8	8
38 WALTERS Team	9 WATT Team	3 E	AS	7	100			0	0
39 DAVIES Team	4 CAMP Team	5X S	8H	10		200		-3	3
40 WOODHALL Team	14 EDGINTON Team	3 E	AS	8	50			-11	11

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 5
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
5X by EW	-5	1100	1
5 by NS	+1	620	1
5 by NS	=	600	5
3NT by NS	=	600	2
4 by EW	-4	200	1
2 by NS	+4	170	1
4 by NS	+1	150	1
3 by NS	+2	150	1
2 by NS	+3	150	2
4 by NS	=	130	2
4 by NS	=	130	2
2 by NS	+2	130	2
3 by NS	=	110	1
3 by NS	=	110	1
2 by NS	+1	110	3
3 by EW	-2	100	1
3 by EW	-1	50	1
3 by EW	-1	50	2
3 by NS	-1	-100	1
5 by NS	-1	-100	5
2 by EW	+1	-140	1
5 by NS	-2	-200	1
5X by NS	-1	-200	2

Alternative display format