Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW		NS	EW
16 BARTOSH Team	36 CAMERON Team	1NT S	5S	7	90			6	-6
1 O'CONNOR Team	21 WESTOBY Team	2 S	3H	10	130			6	-6
39 DAVIES Team	19 WHIBLEY Team	2 E	7D	7	100			-8	8
14 EDGINTON Team	34 YAN Team	2 E	6D	8		110		-5	5
24 NISBET Team	4 CAMP Team	2 W	2S	9		140		-11	11
34 YAN Team	14 EDGINTON Team	2 W	4S	7	100			5	-5
36 CAMERON Team	16 BARTOSH Team	2NT N	4C	5		150		-6	6
13 TANGNEY Team	33 CURRY Team	2 S	7C	7		50		-10	10
2 HARRIS Team	22 MIAO Team	3 S	3H	9	110			6	-6
25 TARBUTT Team	5 HAJMASI Team	3 S	5H	10	130			7	-7
28 DRISCOLL Team	8 GLASS Team	3 S	3H	10	130			6	-6
18 WINSOR Team	38 WALTERS Team	3 S	6H	10	130			-7	7
17 YOUNG Team	37 HENTON Team	3 S	TH	9	110			0	0
10 LIVINGSTON Team	30 LEWIS Team	3 S	3H	10	130			6	-6
37 HENTON Team	17 YOUNG Team	3 S	3H	9	110			0	0
3 PHILLIPS Team	23 GAO BI Team	3 S	3H	9	110			-7	7
32 BEER Team	12 MORRIS Team	3NT N	QH	10	430			11	-11
30 LEWIS Team	10 LIVINGSTON Team	3NT N	QH	7		100		-6	6
35 YANAGISAWA Team	15 CARTNER Team	3NT N	QH	10	430			11	-11
29 GRANT Team	9 WATT Team	3NT N		10	430			11	-11
38 WALTERS Team	18 WINSOR Team	3NT N	QH	10	430			7	-7
27 FISHER Team	7 MATSKOWS Team	3NT N	QH	10	430			11	-11
40 WOODHALL Team	20 FRASER-HOSKIN Team	3NT N	4C	6		150		0	0
12 MORRIS Team	32 BEER Team	3NT N	QH	6		150		-11	11
4 CAMP Team	24 NISBET Team	3NT N	5H	10	430			11	-11
9 WATT Team	29 GRANT Team	3NT N	QH	7		100		-11	11
11 SIMPSON Team	31 WARE Team	3NT N	5H	10	430			0	0
23 GAO BI Team	3 PHILLIPS Team	3NT N	QH	9	400			7	-7
15 CARTNER Team	35 YANAGISAWA Team	3NT N	4C	7		100		-11	11
20 FRASER-HOSKIN Team	40 WOODHALL Team	3NT N	JH	6		150		0	0
21 WESTOBY Team	1 O'CONNOR Team	3NT N	4C	7		100		-6	6
19 WHIBLEY Team	39 DAVIES Team	3NT S	3H	10	430			8	-8
31 WARE Team	11 SIMPSON Team	3NT S	3H	10	430			0	0
33 CURRY Team	13 TANGNEY Team	3NT S		10	430			10	-10
26 RICHARDSON Team	6 JANISZ Team	3NT S	3H	10	430			11	-11
8 GLASS Team	28 DRISCOLL Team	3NT S	2S	7		100		-6	6
7 MATSKOWS Team	27 FISHER Team	3NT S	TH	7		100		-11	11
6 JANISZ Team	26 RICHARDSON Team	3NT S	3H	7		100		-11	11
5 HAJMASI Team	25 TARBUTT Team	3NT S	6H	6		150		-7	7
22 MIAO Team	2 HARRIS Team	4 N	QH	7		150		-6	6

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 9
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3NT by NS	+1	430	7
3NT by NS	+1	430	4
3NT by NS	=	400	1
3 by NS	+1	130	4
2 by NS	+2	130	1
3 by NS	=	110	4
2 by EW	-1	100	1
2 by EW	-1	100	1
1NT by NS	=	90	1
2 by NS	-1	-50	1
3NT by NS	-2	-100	4
3NT by NS	-2	-100	3
2 by EW	=	-110	1
2 by EW	+1	-140	1
3NT by NS	-3	-150	3
4 by NS	-3	-150	1
2NT by NS	-3	-150	1
3NT by NS	-3	-150	1

Alternative display format